← Search
Observed since Jul 7, 2026, 9:31 PMBehaviour-only classificationNo data is estimated or fabricated — missing evidence is always shown as missing

Wallet address

FTGzEqfoyXm5z5gnHypWZhHpEiXpi753ip5EULkzSaP6
Solscan ↗GMGN ↗

SERIAL CREATOR

wallet 2060 (FTGz…SaP6)

📢 Repeated ANSEM campaign — 126 launches

Launches often, with genuinely varied naming — no single repeated template.

launches197

Observed since Jul 7, 2026 — earlier activity, if any, is not reflected in this count.

Creator Insight

A serial creator with genuinely varied naming.

This is based on everything The Trench Desk has observed for this wallet across 197 launches from 2026-07-07T23:04:51.594000Z to 2026-07-28T23:18:28.180000Z. It has also relaunched the same "ANSEM" ticker 126 times.

High confidence

197 launches is well past this pattern's 3-launch minimum, with computable naming-variety data supporting it.

Evidence

  • Classifier rule "serial_creator" fired: launches=197(>=3) normalisedEntropy=0.5988(>=0.5)
  • 197 launches observed, first at 2026-07-07T23:04:51.594000Z, latest at 2026-07-28T23:18:28.180000Z.
  • Median 80.4s between launches.
  • No burst-launch activity detected (no cluster of launches within the burst-detection window).
  • 9 distinct tickers used; "ansem" accounts for 64% of launches (naming-variety score 0.60 on a 0-1 scale).
  • Of 197 previous launches by this wallet old enough to judge, 1 (1%) reached a live market.

What this insight does not know

  • Only activity observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z is counted here — any earlier launches by this wallet, if it has any, are not reflected in this insight.
  • The archetype classification above is a behavioural read only — price, holder count, and trade activity play no part in it. The launch-outcome figure (if shown) is a separate, direct fact about what happened to this wallet's own past tokens, not an input to the archetype.
  • Whether this creator originated a narrative that others copied, or is copying someone else's narrative, is not evaluated in this view (that analysis runs as a separate batch process, not on every live lookup) — the "narrative originator" and "copycat" patterns cannot be selected here as a result.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether this wallet is controlled by the same real-world actor as any other wallet.

Demand Insight — latest launch (39tq…pump)

No trade activity in the last 60 minutes — all observed trading is older.

In the last 60 minutes: 0.000 SOL bought and 0.000 SOL sold, net 0.000 SOL. 20 trades observed in total since 2026-07-28T23:18:29.160Z. Buy volume is concentrated: one wallet accounts for 65% of it.

Medium confidence

20 trades exist in the historical record, but none in the last 60 minutes — this describes past activity, not the current picture.

Evidence

  • Last 60 minutes: 0 unique buyers, 0 unique sellers, 0 trades, 0.000 SOL bought, 0.000 SOL sold.
  • 20 trades observed in total, first at 2026-07-28T23:18:29.160Z, latest at 2026-07-28T23:18:52.374Z.
  • Last 5 minutes vs. the preceding 5 minutes: +0 buyer(s), 0.000 SOL change in net inflow.
  • Top buyer (wallet 258901) accounts for 65% of buy volume across 2 unique buyers.
  • 3.5 buy transactions per unique buyer on average; the top buyer alone made 14% of all buy transactions.
  • Has not migrated yet (still pre-migration).

What this insight does not know

  • Only trades observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z are counted here — any earlier trading history for this token, if it has any, is not reflected in this insight.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether multiple buyer or seller wallets are controlled by the same real-world actor — concentration figures describe wallets, not identities.
  • Rapid buy-then-sell flip timing and synchronised-buy clusters are not evaluated — there is no validated threshold for calling activity 'fast' or 'synchronised', so none is invented here.
  • Bonding-curve progress (percentage toward migration) is not available — the formula has not been validated against a known-good reference.
  • More than half of observed buy volume comes from a single wallet — this could reflect one active participant rather than broad independent demand; The Trench Desk does not interpret which.

Evidence

First / latest
40d 12h ago → 19d 12h ago
Rhythm
80.4s median
Bursts
none
Naming
9 distinct · top "ansem" 64% · variety 0.60

Latest launches