← Search
Observed since Jul 7, 2026, 9:31 PMBehaviour-only classificationNo data is estimated or fabricated — missing evidence is always shown as missing

Wallet address

AeZpHiVXZ62G8qY1g84qVrq2z877RoiUDRq4QsTp2RJj
Solscan ↗GMGN ↗

SERIAL CREATOR

wallet 295010 (AeZp…2RJj)

📢 Repeated OCISLY campaign — 39 launches

Launches often, with genuinely varied naming — no single repeated template.

launches424

Observed since Jul 7, 2026 — earlier activity, if any, is not reflected in this count.

Creator Insight

A serial creator with genuinely varied naming.

This is based on everything The Trench Desk has observed for this wallet across 424 launches from 2026-07-29T00:37:49.991000Z to 2026-08-17T09:50:01.996000Z. It has also relaunched the same "OCISLY" ticker 39 times.

High confidence

424 launches is well past this pattern's 3-launch minimum, with computable naming-variety data supporting it.

Evidence

  • Classifier rule "serial_creator" fired: launches=424(>=3) normalisedEntropy=0.9111(>=0.5)
  • 424 launches observed, first at 2026-07-29T00:37:49.991000Z, latest at 2026-08-17T09:50:01.996000Z.
  • Median 1.3s between launches.
  • 101 bursts detected, largest containing 12 launches.
  • 52 distinct tickers used; "ocisly" accounts for 9% of launches (naming-variety score 0.91 on a 0-1 scale).
  • Of 355 previous launches by this wallet old enough to judge, 0 (0%) reached a live market. 69 more launches are too recent to judge yet.

What this insight does not know

  • Only activity observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z is counted here — any earlier launches by this wallet, if it has any, are not reflected in this insight.
  • The archetype classification above is a behavioural read only — price, holder count, and trade activity play no part in it. The launch-outcome figure (if shown) is a separate, direct fact about what happened to this wallet's own past tokens, not an input to the archetype.
  • Whether this creator originated a narrative that others copied, or is copying someone else's narrative, is not evaluated in this view (that analysis runs as a separate batch process, not on every live lookup) — the "narrative originator" and "copycat" patterns cannot be selected here as a result.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether this wallet is controlled by the same real-world actor as any other wallet.

Demand Insight — latest launch (8Afm…pump)

No trade evidence has been observed for this token yet.

The Trench Desk has not observed any buy or sell trades for this token, so no demand picture can be described.

Low confidence

No trade evidence has been observed for this token — there is nothing yet to measure demand from.

What this insight does not know

  • Only trades observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z are counted here — any earlier trading history for this token, if it has any, is not reflected in this insight.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether multiple buyer or seller wallets are controlled by the same real-world actor — concentration figures describe wallets, not identities.
  • Rapid buy-then-sell flip timing and synchronised-buy clusters are not evaluated — there is no validated threshold for calling activity 'fast' or 'synchronised', so none is invented here.
  • Bonding-curve progress (percentage toward migration) is not available — the formula has not been validated against a known-good reference.

Evidence

First / latest
19d 10h ago → 48m ago
Rhythm
1.3s median
Bursts
101 (max 12)
Naming
52 distinct · top "ocisly" 9% · variety 0.91

Latest launches