← Search
Observed since Jul 7, 2026, 9:31 PMBehaviour-only classificationNo data is estimated or fabricated — missing evidence is always shown as missing

Wallet address

GNgsXfQMSP5FCARAbRSXL9YnQpYZ8AZAGEzJLzDxFcYL
Solscan ↗GMGN ↗

SERIAL CREATOR

wallet 3530544 (GNgs…FcYL)

📢 Repeated DAN campaign — 3 launches

Launches often, with genuinely varied naming — no single repeated template.

launches7

Observed since Jul 7, 2026 — earlier activity, if any, is not reflected in this count.

Creator Insight

A serial creator with genuinely varied naming.

This is based on everything The Trench Desk has observed for this wallet across 7 launches from 2026-08-02T23:26:44.250000Z to 2026-08-02T23:48:26.441000Z. It has also relaunched the same "DAN" ticker 3 times.

High confidence

7 launches is well past this pattern's 3-launch minimum, with computable naming-variety data supporting it.

Evidence

  • Classifier rule "serial_creator" fired: launches=7(>=3) normalisedEntropy=0.9212(>=0.5)
  • 7 launches observed, first at 2026-08-02T23:26:44.250000Z, latest at 2026-08-02T23:48:26.441000Z.
  • Median 244.6s between launches.
  • No burst-launch activity detected (no cluster of launches within the burst-detection window).
  • 4 distinct tickers used; "dan" accounts for 43% of launches (naming-variety score 0.92 on a 0-1 scale).
  • Of 7 previous launches by this wallet old enough to judge, 0 (0%) reached a live market.

What this insight does not know

  • Only activity observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z is counted here — any earlier launches by this wallet, if it has any, are not reflected in this insight.
  • The archetype classification above is a behavioural read only — price, holder count, and trade activity play no part in it. The launch-outcome figure (if shown) is a separate, direct fact about what happened to this wallet's own past tokens, not an input to the archetype.
  • Whether this creator originated a narrative that others copied, or is copying someone else's narrative, is not evaluated in this view (that analysis runs as a separate batch process, not on every live lookup) — the "narrative originator" and "copycat" patterns cannot be selected here as a result.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether this wallet is controlled by the same real-world actor as any other wallet.

Demand Insight — latest launch (E3qc…pump)

No trade activity in the last 60 minutes — all observed trading is older.

In the last 60 minutes: 0.000 SOL bought and 0.000 SOL sold, net 0.000 SOL. 15 trades observed in total since 2026-08-02T23:48:51.879Z. Buy volume is concentrated: one wallet accounts for 91% of it.

Medium confidence

15 trades exist in the historical record, but none in the last 60 minutes — this describes past activity, not the current picture.

Evidence

  • Last 60 minutes: 0 unique buyers, 0 unique sellers, 0 trades, 0.000 SOL bought, 0.000 SOL sold.
  • 15 trades observed in total, first at 2026-08-02T23:48:51.879Z, latest at 2026-08-02T23:49:33.136Z.
  • Last 5 minutes vs. the preceding 5 minutes: +0 buyer(s), 0.000 SOL change in net inflow.
  • Top buyer (wallet 37159) accounts for 91% of buy volume across 2 unique buyers.
  • 3.0 buy transactions per unique buyer on average; the top buyer alone made 83% of all buy transactions.
  • Has not migrated yet (still pre-migration).

What this insight does not know

  • Only trades observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z are counted here — any earlier trading history for this token, if it has any, is not reflected in this insight.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether multiple buyer or seller wallets are controlled by the same real-world actor — concentration figures describe wallets, not identities.
  • Rapid buy-then-sell flip timing and synchronised-buy clusters are not evaluated — there is no validated threshold for calling activity 'fast' or 'synchronised', so none is invented here.
  • Bonding-curve progress (percentage toward migration) is not available — the formula has not been validated against a known-good reference.
  • More than half of observed buy volume comes from a single wallet — this could reflect one active participant rather than broad independent demand; The Trench Desk does not interpret which.

Evidence

First / latest
14d 12h ago → 14d 11h ago
Rhythm
4.1m median
Bursts
none
Naming
4 distinct · top "dan" 43% · variety 0.92

Latest launches