← Search
Observed since Jul 7, 2026, 9:31 PMBehaviour-only classificationNo data is estimated or fabricated — missing evidence is always shown as missing

Wallet address

bwamJzztZsepfkteWRChggmXuiiCQvpLqPietdNfSXa
Solscan ↗GMGN ↗

SERIAL CREATOR

wallet 44 (bwam…fSXa)

📢 Repeated WIF campaign — 26 launches

Launches often, with genuinely varied naming — no single repeated template.

launches5098

Observed since Jul 7, 2026 — earlier activity, if any, is not reflected in this count.

Creator Insight

A serial creator with genuinely varied naming.

This is based on everything The Trench Desk has observed for this wallet across 5098 launches from 2026-07-07T21:32:56.908000Z to 2026-08-17T02:30:37.038000Z. It has also relaunched the same "WIF" ticker 26 times.

High confidence

5098 launches is well past this pattern's 3-launch minimum, with computable naming-variety data supporting it.

Evidence

  • Classifier rule "serial_creator" fired: launches=5098(>=3) normalisedEntropy=0.9649(>=0.5)
  • 5098 launches observed, first at 2026-07-07T21:32:56.908000Z, latest at 2026-08-17T02:30:37.038000Z.
  • Median 55.1s between launches.
  • 47 bursts detected, largest containing 13 launches — at least one burst was machine-speed (sub-second intervals).
  • 2831 distinct tickers used; "wif" accounts for 1% of launches (naming-variety score 0.96 on a 0-1 scale).
  • Of 4844 previous launches by this wallet old enough to judge, 64 (1%) reached a live market. 254 more launches are too recent to judge yet.

What this insight does not know

  • Only activity observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z is counted here — any earlier launches by this wallet, if it has any, are not reflected in this insight.
  • The archetype classification above is a behavioural read only — price, holder count, and trade activity play no part in it. The launch-outcome figure (if shown) is a separate, direct fact about what happened to this wallet's own past tokens, not an input to the archetype.
  • Whether this creator originated a narrative that others copied, or is copying someone else's narrative, is not evaluated in this view (that analysis runs as a separate batch process, not on every live lookup) — the "narrative originator" and "copycat" patterns cannot be selected here as a result.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether this wallet is controlled by the same real-world actor as any other wallet.

Demand Insight — latest launch (CyzM…sZqA)

No trade evidence has been observed for this token yet.

The Trench Desk has not observed any buy or sell trades for this token, so no demand picture can be described.

Low confidence

No trade evidence has been observed for this token — there is nothing yet to measure demand from.

What this insight does not know

  • Only trades observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z are counted here — any earlier trading history for this token, if it has any, is not reflected in this insight.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether multiple buyer or seller wallets are controlled by the same real-world actor — concentration figures describe wallets, not identities.
  • Rapid buy-then-sell flip timing and synchronised-buy clusters are not evaluated — there is no validated threshold for calling activity 'fast' or 'synchronised', so none is invented here.
  • Bonding-curve progress (percentage toward migration) is not available — the formula has not been validated against a known-good reference.

Evidence

First / latest
40d 13h ago → 8h 48m ago
Rhythm
55.1s median
Bursts
47 (max 13) 🤖 machine-speed
Naming
2831 distinct · top "wif" 1% · variety 0.96

Latest launches