← Search
Observed since Jul 7, 2026, 9:31 PMBehaviour-only classificationNo data is estimated or fabricated β€” missing evidence is always shown as missing

Wallet address

BALCj4SEjBBBXGfeLB2nhLRCWT3XkqmXM1twc6mTxEWx

SERIAL CREATOR

wallet 4491 (BALC…xEWx)

πŸ“’ Repeated PEPE campaign β€” 5 launches

Launches often, with genuinely varied naming β€” no single repeated template.

launches221

Observed since Jul 7, 2026 β€” earlier activity, if any, is not reflected in this count.

Creator Insight

A serial creator with genuinely varied naming.

This is based on everything The Trench Desk has observed for this wallet across 221 launches from 2026-07-08T05:53:23.170000Z to 2026-08-17T01:37:17.196000Z. It has also relaunched the same "PEPE" ticker 5 times.

High confidence

221 launches is well past this pattern's 3-launch minimum, with computable naming-variety data supporting it.

Evidence

  • Classifier rule "serial_creator" fired: launches=221(>=3) normalisedEntropy=0.9889(>=0.5)
  • 221 launches observed, first at 2026-07-08T05:53:23.170000Z, latest at 2026-08-17T01:37:17.196000Z.
  • Median 1164.9s between launches.
  • No burst-launch activity detected (no cluster of launches within the burst-detection window).
  • 189 distinct tickers used; "pepe" accounts for 2% of launches (naming-variety score 0.99 on a 0-1 scale).
  • Of 208 previous launches by this wallet old enough to judge, 0 (0%) reached a live market. 13 more launches are too recent to judge yet.

What this insight does not know

  • Only activity observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z is counted here β€” any earlier launches by this wallet, if it has any, are not reflected in this insight.
  • The archetype classification above is a behavioural read only β€” price, holder count, and trade activity play no part in it. The launch-outcome figure (if shown) is a separate, direct fact about what happened to this wallet's own past tokens, not an input to the archetype.
  • Whether this creator originated a narrative that others copied, or is copying someone else's narrative, is not evaluated in this view (that analysis runs as a separate batch process, not on every live lookup) β€” the "narrative originator" and "copycat" patterns cannot be selected here as a result.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether this wallet is controlled by the same real-world actor as any other wallet.

Demand Insight β€” latest launch (Gt5M…pump)

No trade evidence has been observed for this token yet.

The Trench Desk has not observed any buy or sell trades for this token, so no demand picture can be described.

Low confidence

No trade evidence has been observed for this token β€” there is nothing yet to measure demand from.

What this insight does not know

  • Only trades observed since 2026-07-07T21:31:17Z are counted here β€” any earlier trading history for this token, if it has any, is not reflected in this insight.
  • The Trench Desk cannot confirm whether multiple buyer or seller wallets are controlled by the same real-world actor β€” concentration figures describe wallets, not identities.
  • Rapid buy-then-sell flip timing and synchronised-buy clusters are not evaluated β€” there is no validated threshold for calling activity 'fast' or 'synchronised', so none is invented here.
  • Bonding-curve progress (percentage toward migration) is not available β€” the formula has not been validated against a known-good reference.

Evidence

First / latest
40d 5h ago β†’ 9h 44m ago
Rhythm
19.4m median
Bursts
none
Naming
189 distinct Β· top "pepe" 2% Β· variety 0.99

Latest launches